Selecting a permanent magnet generator means choosing more than a power rating. The way flux travels through the machine, radially or axially, shapes the torque, size, cost and reliability of the finished unit. An axial flux versus a radial flux permanent magnet generator can look equally capable on paper yet behave very differently in the field. ENNENG builds both topologies from 5kW to 500kW so every project gets a flux design matched to its real operating conditions.
![]()
To choose correctly, we must first understand how each topology routes flux and why that geometry changes generator behaviour under load.
A radial flux permanent magnet generator pushes flux outward through the air gap between a cylindrical rotor and a surrounding stator, a layout that is mature and easy to manufacture at scale. An axial flux permanent magnet generator sends flux along the shaft between flat disc rotor and stator faces, creating a short, compact path. The axial design uses the full disc surface to extract more torque from the same magnet mass, while the radial design scales more predictably as power rises.
Flux path length, magnet utilisation and cooling surface all follow from the geometry. A shorter axial path raises torque density but concentrates heat in a narrow disc; a longer radial path spreads losses across a larger, easier to cool frame. This trade off decides whether a permanent magnetic generator stays efficient across its 20 year design life.
Axial flux machines suit low speed, high torque duty where space is tight. Without a gearbox the disc rotor turns at the same speed as the turbine shaft, so a slim axial generator replaces a much bulkier frame.
![]()
Radial flux machines remain the industry standard for medium and high power. The cylindrical layout gives a large winding and cooling area, simple bearing support and easy scale up to 500kW and beyond.
![]()
| Item | Axial Flux PMG | Radial Flux PMG |
|---|---|---|
| Flux direction | Along the shaft, disc air gap | Radially across cylindrical air gap |
| Typical power range | 0.5kW to 50kW | 5KW to 5MW and above |
| Torque density | High, compact disc package | Moderate, larger frame |
| Scalability | Best at low to medium power | Excellent at high power |
| Cooling | Short path, concentrated heat | Larger surface, easier to cool |
| Manufacturing cost | Higher per kW at high power | Lower, mature supply chain |
| Typical applications | Micro hydro, small wind, direct drive | Wind, hydro, industrial generation |
Both topologies support gearless direct drive. By increasing pole count, ENNENG builds permanent magnet generators rated from 60rpm to 600rpm without a gearbox, removing rotating parts, gear oil and failure points.
A 20kW axial flux permanent magnet generator at 200rpm powers a micro hydro site where headroom is limited; the thin disc package mounts directly on the turbine shaft with no reducer.
A 100kW radial flux permanent magnet generator at 120rpm serves an onshore wind turbine, its large cooling area holding class H insulation within rated rise through continuous operation.
No two projects share the same speed, voltage, shaft or mounting constraints. ENNENG provides free electromagnetic design proposals, voltages from 220V to 690V, bespoke shafts and full OEM service. Every generator is full load tested before delivery.
WhatsApp: +86 185 6278 0228
E-Mail: sales@enpmsm.com
Phone: +86 532 6600 0559
Address: Haichuang New Energy & New Materials Industrial Park, No.1 Guiding Road, Licang District, Qingdao, China
Website: www.pmacmotor.com
A: Both reach 96% to 97% efficiency. Axial flux excels at torque density in compact low speed machines, while radial flux is more efficient and cost effective at high power.
A: Yes, but disc diameter and cooling demand grow quickly; above 100kW a radial flux machine usually offers better cost, cooling and reliability.
A: Send ENNENG your power, speed, ambient conditions and space limits; our engineers will model both topologies and recommend the most cost effective option.